BERIL Knowledge Wiki

Method

Kraken2

Corroborated. AI-generated wiki from AI-conducted research reports. Partially reviewed by scientists. See About This Wiki.

Projects cited
2 project reports, listed in the margin
Relations
supports 1refines 1
Linked from
3 pages1 topic

What it is

Canonical name: Kraken2. 1

Known aliases: No aliases were reported in the source document. 1

Stable external identifier: None was reported in the source document. 1

Kraken2 is a taxonomic classification method whose NMDC deployment used a prokaryote-restricted reference database. 1

Evidence from euk_in_prok_correlates

Kraken2 produced approximately 0 domain-level Eukaryota signal in the analysis of 2,759 NMDC ReadbasedAnalysis runs because its NMDC reference database was prokaryote-restricted. 1

The only eukaryotic kingdom represented in the Kraken2 deployment was Metazoa/human. 1

Because Kraken2 produced approximately 0 usable domain-level Eukaryota signal, it was not used to estimate the eukaryotic fraction in this analysis. 1

The result demonstrates that Kraken2 and centrifuge were not interchangeable with gottcha2 for eukaryote quantification in this NMDC deployment, because GOTTCHA2 was plastid- and eukaryote-aware whereas the Kraken2 and Centrifuge databases were prokaryote-restricted. 1

Accordingly, cross-collection contamination-quality-control analyses should account for classifier and database compatibility rather than treating Kraken2-derived and GOTTCHA2-derived eukaryotic fractions as equivalent. 1

Evidence from harvard_forest_warming

The Harvard Forest study refines the eukaryote-detection limitation: despite the prokaryote-restricted deployment, Kraken2 read-based relative abundance was used for bacterial community comparison and detected Actinobacteria increasing from 0.249 to 0.315 and Acidobacteria decreasing from 0.035 to 0.024 in heated organic soil, with q=0.049 for both changes. 2

This supports using Kraken2 for prokaryotic community-level contrasts while retaining the existing warning that its output is unsuitable for estimating eukaryotic fractions in this deployment. 2,1

This method-specific limitation is relevant to multi-omics-integration, which concerns integration of taxonomic results with environmental and sequencing metadata, and to cross-tenant-data-bridging, which covers linking NMDC workflow results with sample metadata. 1

See the project summaries: Metadata Correlates of Eukaryotic Contamination in NMDC Prokaryote-Targeted Metagenomes and Harvard Forest Long-Term Warming — DNA vs RNA Functional Response. 1,2

Projects cited

  1. Metadata Correlates of Eukaryotic Contamination in NMDC Prokaryote-Targeted Metagenomeseuk_in_prok_correlates · cited 12× · primary source · supports
  2. Harvard Forest Long-Term Warming — DNA vs RNA Functional Responseharvard_forest_warming · cited 3× · refines · supports